What I like

• Good presentation and slides
• Well selected set of techniques
• Practical and usable
• Will be useful as soon as Monday
• Good link with fellow Agile practitioners at my table
• Good flow, good balance between "theory" and interaction
• Nice tools
• "SImple", compact
• Good expertise of the the presenters
• Humor!
• Hands on
• Sensible and simple
• The four methods to think about your problem
• Switching between workshop and presentation
• Presenting skills
• More broadly applicable than just for architecture
• Great practices
• The exercises
• The interactivity
• Some new tools to think about using to communicate with stakeholders
• Great presentation skills
• Good link rules/exercises
• Focus on communication
• Focus on communication tools
• Practicing
• Interesting
• Techniques can be used right away
• Some good techniques
• Good idea to apply communication & problem solving tools to architecture fights
• Not technical
• Exercises
• Good slides
• Good content
• Very practical, interactive
• Good techniques
• Learned to use drawings, sketches and stories to detach from a context to start thinking from a different angle
• Communication tools to get the bigger picture common goals, to think creatively => what does success look like? It was very powerful
• Focus on communication & value for architects
• Interactive part
• Ways to talk about your situations and tools to realise your solution
• Fun, interactive collaboration
• Lots of effective and short exercises keep the session lively
• Interesting methods clearly explained!

To improve

• 7 minutes instead of 5
• A bit more time
• More references to  books about the content
• Maybe too much content for the available time? Too much content for participants to assimilate?
• A round of beer at the end :-)
• Give some use case cases and discuss them in a bigger group
• Apply real architecture examples
• Correct synopsis and title
• Make it relate more the job of an architect or make it broader and relate it to other roles as well
• Storytelling in 5 minutes is very short to get across the power of this method
• I did not expect this content: "softer" than expected
• Slides could be more readable
• Longer?
• More techniques, less workshop
• Abstract didn't match the content well
• The schedule
• More examples from the real world (e.g. real story instead of imaginary stories)
• Based on the abstract I was expecting something else. I expected tools or ideas fro improving architecture, not communications stuff.
• Stay on schedule!!
• I would like to have heard Sander more, it was clear that Gerard was the "manager" :-)
• Has not a lot to do with "architecture" (and even less with "enterprise architecture"), is broader than architecture
• 10 principles -> 4 techniques !
• Overlap of Solutions-Based Thinking with session by Pierluigi
• Timing
• It's not really specific for architecture. It can be used in any role, so the title could be better.
• Extra link to architecture
• A lot of material for one hour