What I liked about it:
  • the topic is very interesting
  • good and simple slides
  • wanting to involve us
  • the use of various media
  • different techniques
  • open up new ideas to document
  • trying not to bore paople with some subject and get diversity
  • good overview of different techniques
  • liked the experience of drawing the problem
  • map-reduce experience
  • drawings
  • nice overview
  • invitation to go further
  • introduction
  • very good ideas
  • interactive
  • interesting
  • fun
  • useful for mmy job
  • drawing is very powerful
  • it was hands-on
  • nice examples of visualisation, oher than drawing
  • concept
  • references
  • the examples were fun
  • I hope to apply it sometimes
  • good subject

To make it perfect:

  • believe in it more
  • kill the darlings and stick to one or two topics because we really need to try it ourselves as you say
  • use an example of the real world to illustrate. that wa we don't need to spend time figuring out how it may be used. We learn faster from real examples.
  • more focus on one topic to understand it
  • limit the diversity. Diversity is good but participants didn't have enough participation. Make sure participants stay idle during practice
  • More practice from the book
  • More drawings
  • redraw the same problem
  • might be more in-depth
  • more time
  • more exercises
  • explain the book better
  • a lot of sending
  • too little time to go into details
  • more interaction with the audience
  • take out the map-reduce; this is not really about visualisation
  • work and practice more around the Dan Roam book
  • is it a good idea to keep it sticked to professional life?
  • a bit confused, not as highly interactive as expected
  • keep theory visible during examples
  • too short
  • more solutions
  • prepare more paper for exercises